<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 29 May 2012 05:42:59 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Memoir</title><link>http://www.jessiedanielsphd.com/memoir/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Art, Politics and Memoir</title><dc:creator>Jessie Daniels</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.jessiedanielsphd.com/memoir/2011/3/17/art-politics-and-memoir.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">834470:9805294:10831796</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Toni Morrison writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"That's a pejorative term in critical circles now: if a work of art has any political influence in it, somehow it's tainted. My feeling is just the opposite: if it has none, it is tainted. The problem comes when you find harangue passing off as art. It seems to me the best art is political and you ought to be able to make it unquestionably political and irrevocably beautiful at the same time."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jessiedanielsphd.com/memoir/rss-comments-entry-10831796.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
